Syner-Kinase and associated names
- Procedure started
- Under evaluation
- CHMP opinion
- European Commission final decision
Table of contents
Overview
EMA completes review following disagreement among EU Member States
On 28 February 2019, the European Medicines Agency completed a review of Syner-Kinase and associated names following a disagreement among EU Member States regarding its authorisation. The Agency concluded that the benefits of Syner-Kinase outweigh its risks, and the marketing authorisation granted in the United Kingdom can be recognised in other Member States of the EU where the company has applied for a marketing authorisation.
Key facts
About this medicine
|
|
---|---|
Approved name |
Syner-Kinase and associated names
|
International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name |
urokinase
|
About this procedure
|
|
---|---|
Current status |
European Commission final decision
|
Reference number |
EMA-H-A-29(4)-1472
|
Type |
Article 29(4) referrals
This type of referral is triggered when there is a disagreement between Member States regarding a marketing authorisation application being evaluated in a mutual-recognition or decentralised procedure, on the grounds of a potential serious risk to public health. |
Authorisation model |
Nationally authorised product(s)
|
Key dates and outcomes
|
|
---|---|
CHMP opinion date |
28/02/2019
|
EC decision date |
16/05/2019
|
All documents
Opinion provided by Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use
European Commission final decision
Syner-Kinase Article 29(4) referral - CHMP assessment report (PDF/840.7 KB)
First published: 03/06/2019
EMA/294785/2019
Syner-Kinase Article 29(4) referral - Annex II (PDF/36.11 KB)
First published: 03/06/2019
Syner-Kinase Article 29(4) referral - Annex I (PDF/86.63 KB)
First published: 03/06/2019
Description of documents published
Please note that some of the listed documents apply only to certain procedures.
- Overview - lay-language summary of the stage of the procedure
- Notification – a letter from a Member State, the European Commission or the marketing authorisation holder requesting the initiation of the procedure
- Scientific background – further background information from the triggering Member State on the issues leading to the initiation of the procedure (if applicable)
- List of questions – questions agreed by the Committee requesting further information from the marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s) to evaluate the issues identified
- Timetable for the procedure – agreed timeframe to respond to the list of questions, to assess the issues and to adopt a conclusion
- List of medicines concerned by the procedure – medicine(s) / active substance(s) concerned, and marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s)
- List of questions to be addressed by the stakeholders – call for data to be submitted by stakeholders (e.g. healthcare professionals, patient organisations, individual patients) (if applicable)
- Stakeholder submission form – form to be used by stakeholders to submit data (if applicable)
- Scientific conclusions – scientific conclusions of the PRAC and/or CHMP and/or CMDh
- Assessment report – PRAC or CHMP assessment and conclusions on the issues investigated, including divergent positions (if applicable)
- Divergent positions – divergent positions of the CHMP or CMDh members for pharmacovigilance procedures (if applicable)
- Changes to the summary of product characteristics, labelling and package leaflet (amended sections or fully revised version) (if applicable)
- Condition(s) to the marketing authorisation(s) – condition(s) for the safe and effective use of the medicine(s) (if applicable)
- Condition for lifting the suspension – condition to be fulfilled for the suspension of the marketing authorisation(s) to be lifted (if applicable)
- Timetable for implementation of CMDh position – agreed timeframe to submit and finalise the variation(s) implementing the outcome of the procedure (if applicable)
Note that older documents may have different titles.