Meeting highlights from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) 19-22 July 2010
Press release
Human
Update on the ongoing benefit-risk review of Avandia, Avandamet and Avaglim
The CHMP is currently reviewing the rosiglitazone-containing antidiabetes medicines Avandia (rosiglitazone), Avaglim (rosiglitazone/glimepiride) and Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin hydrochloride), from Smithkline Beecham Ltd, to determine the impact of new data, from recent publications on the risk of cardiovascular problems, on the benefit-risk profile of these medicines. While the Committee is reviewing all available data, prescribers in Europe are reminded to strictly follow the recommendations in the product information with respect to patients indicated for treatment, defined contraindications and warnings.
Positive opinion for a new medicine adopted
The Committee adopted a positive opinion recommending the granting of a marketing authorisation for Twynsta (telmisartan/amlodipine), from Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, intended for the treatment of essential hypertension. The review for Twynsta began on 23 September 2009 with an active review time of 210 days.
Positive opinion for generic medicines adopted
The Committee adopted positive opinions recommending the granting of marketing authorisations for the following generic medicines:
Positive opinions for extensions of indications adopted
The Committee gave positive opinions for applications for an extension of the therapeutic indications, adding new treatment options for medicines that are already authorised in the European Union:
New paediatric indication for Xalatan
The CHMP recommended an extension of the therapeutic indications of Xalatan eye drops and associated names (latanoprost), from Pfizer group of companies, to include the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure in the treatment of paediatric patients with elevated intraocular pressure and paediatric glaucoma.
The Committee's recommendation was made on the basis of data generated in accordance with an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP).
Update on the review of rotavirus vaccines
The CHMP finalised a review of the oral vaccine Rotarix (rotavirus vaccine, live) from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals S.A., following the detection of porcine circovirus 1 (PCV1) DNA in the vaccine. The Committee concluded that the vaccine continues to have a positive benefit-risk balance and that the presence of a very small amount of viral particles does not present a risk to public health.
The review of the rotavirus vaccine, Rotateq, from Sanofi Pasteur MSD, SNC, following the detection of porcine virus in this vaccine is still ongoing and will be considered in September. The CHMP is awaiting further information from the manufacturer on the root cause of the findings and on measures to manufacture the vaccine free of porcine virus. While this review is still ongoing, the Committee confirmed its previous position that there is no need to restrict the use of Rotateq.
Review of topical formulations of ketoprofen concluded
Finalising a review of topical formulations of ketoprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), the Committee concluded that the benefits of these medicines continue to outweigh their risks. However, the Committee recommended that doctors should inform patients on how to use these medicines appropriately to prevent the occurrence of serious skin photosensitivity reactions.
Review of modafinil-containing medicines concluded
Finalising a review of modafinil-containing medicines, the Committee recommended restricting the use of these medicines to the treatment of sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. Doctors and patients should no longer use these medicines for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia, excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnoea or chronic shift work sleep disorder.
Modafinil is a wakefulness promoting agent. The review had been initiated because of a number of safety concerns relating to neuropsychiatric disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue reactions as well as significant off-label use and potential for abuse.
Review of modified-release oral opioids concluded
Finalising a review of modified-release oral opioid products in level III of the World Health Organization (WHO) scale for the management of pain, the Committee recommended the suspension of formulations using polymethacrylate-triethylcitrate controlled release systems because of their interaction with alcohol. The Committee concluded that other formulations had a positive benefit-risk balance, but recommended harmonising existing warnings regarding concomitant use of these medicines with alcohol.
Modified-release oral opioids of the WHO level III scale for the management of pain are strong painkillers used to treat pain that has not been controlled with other medicines.
Harmonisation referral on Daivobet concluded
The Committee recommended the harmonisation of the prescribing information for Daivobet and associated names (calcipotriol/betamethasone), from Leo Pharma and associated companies. The review was initiated because of differences in the summaries of product characteristics, labelling and package leaflets in the countries where the products are marketed. These medicines are authorised to treat psoriasis.
Review of dexrazoxane-containing medicines started
The Committee has begun looking at the possible risk of acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML), myelodyspastic syndrome (MDS) and solid tumours in paediatric patients taking dexrazoxane- containing medicines for the prevention of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. This follows the review of published literature, together with the results of randomised clinical trials, which suggests that these medicines may be linked with a three-fold increased risk of secondary malignancies, especially AML and MDS. At the same time, the available clinical studies show only limited efficacy of these medicines in the prevention of cardiotoxicity, and the alternative treatment options of heart failure have been markedly improved.
The CHMP will review all available data thoroughly, including published data, non-clinical and clinical data (including data from clinical trials and epidemiological studies), to clarify the impact of the increased risk of secondary malignancies, coupled with limited data on efficacy, on the balance of risks and benefits of these medicines.
Notes