- Procedure started
- Under evaluation
- CHMP opinion
- European Commission final decision
Ciprofloxacine Kabi and associated names, Solution for infusion, 2 mg/ml, is an antibiotic belonging to the quinolone family effective in vitro against a large number of Gram-negative aerobic bacteria as well as against some Gram-positive organisms.
Fresenius Kabi Nederland B.V. submitted applications for mutual recognition of Ciprofloxacine Kabi and associated names, Solution for infusion, 2 mg/ml on the basis of the marketing authorisation granted by Netherlands on 23 September 2005. The Mutual Recognition Procedure started on 17 December 2005. The Reference Member State was the Netherlands and the Concerned Member States were Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Greece, Spain, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, Slovak Republic and United Kingdom.
These Member States were not able to reach an agreement in respect of the Mutual Recognition of the Marketing Authorisation granted by the Reference Member State. The Netherlands referred the reasons for disagreement to the EMEA on 9 June 2006.
On the basis of the questions raised by the Member States, the points to be considered by the CHMP were the recommended dose in urinary tract infections and of the maximum adult daily dose.
The arbitration procedure started on 28 June 2006 with the adoption of a list of questions. The Rapporteur was Dr Ian Hudson and Co-Rapporteur was Dr Bengt Ljungberg. The Marketing Authorisation Holder provided written explanations on 2 August 2006.
During their November 2006 meeting, the CHMP, in the light of the overall data submitted and the scientific discussion within the Committee, was of the opinion that the benefit/risk ratio is favourable Ciprofloxacine Kabi and associated names, that the objections raised should not prevent the granting of a Marketing Authorisation and that the Summary of Product Characteristics, labelling and package leaflet of the Reference Member State should be amended. A positive opinion was adopted by consensus on 16 November 2006.
The list of the product names concerned is given in Annex I. The scientific conclusions are provided in Annex II, together with the Summary of Product Characteristics in Annex III.
The final opinion was converted into a Decision by the European Commission on 24 January 2007.
About this medicine
|International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name||
About this procedure
European Commission final decision
Article 29(4) referrals
This type of referral is triggered when there is a disagreement between Member States regarding a marketing authorisation application being evaluated in a mutual-recognition or decentralised procedure, on the grounds of a potential serious risk to public health.
Key dates and outcomes
|CHMP opinion date||
|EC decision date||
Description of documents published
Please note that some of the listed documents apply only to certain procedures.
- Overview - lay-language summary of the stage of the procedure
- Notification – a letter from a Member State, the European Commission or the marketing authorisation holder requesting the initiation of the procedure
- Scientific background – further background information from the triggering Member State on the issues leading to the initiation of the procedure (if applicable)
- List of questions – questions agreed by the Committee requesting further information from the marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s) to evaluate the issues identified
- Timetable for the procedure – agreed timeframe to respond to the list of questions, to assess the issues and to adopt a conclusion
- List of medicines concerned by the procedure – medicine(s) / active substance(s) concerned, and marketing authorisation holder(s) / applicant(s)
- List of questions to be addressed by the stakeholders – call for data to be submitted by stakeholders (e.g. healthcare professionals, patient organisations, individual patients) (if applicable)
- Stakeholder submission form – form to be used by stakeholders to submit data (if applicable)
- Scientific conclusions – scientific conclusions of the PRAC and/or CHMP and/or CMDh
- Assessment report – PRAC or CHMP assessment and conclusions on the issues investigated, including divergent positions (if applicable)
- Divergent positions – divergent positions of the CHMP or CMDh members for pharmacovigilance procedures (if applicable)
- Changes to the summary of product characteristics, labelling and package leaflet (amended sections or fully revised version) (if applicable)
- Condition(s) to the marketing authorisation(s) – condition(s) for the safe and effective use of the medicine(s) (if applicable)
- Condition for lifting the suspension – condition to be fulfilled for the suspension of the marketing authorisation(s) to be lifted (if applicable)
- Timetable for implementation of CMDh position – agreed timeframe to submit and finalise the variation(s) implementing the outcome of the procedure (if applicable)
Note that older documents may have different titles.