Meeting highlights from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), 21-24 June 2010
Press release
Human
Positive opinions for new medicines adopted
The Committee adopted positive opinions recommending the granting of marketing authorisations for the following new medicines:
Positive opinion for a 'hybrid generic' medicine adopted
The Committee adopted a positive opinion recommending the granting of a marketing authorisation for PecFent (fentanyl), from Archimedes Development Ltd, intended for the treatment of breakthrough pain in adults who are already receiving maintenance opioid therapy for chronic cancer pain. PecFent is a 'hybrid generic' medicine. This means that this medicine contains a known active substance, but is presented in a new pharmaceutical form (nasal spray). The medicines Actiq lozenges and Effentora buccal tablets are the reference products. The review for PecFent began on 27 May 2009 with an active review time of 203 days.
Positive opinions for generic medicines adopted
The Committee adopted positive opinions recommending the granting of marketing authorisations for the following generic medicines:
Positive opinions for extensions of indications adopted
The Committee gave positive opinions for applications for extension of the therapeutic indications, adding new treatment options for medicines that are already authorised in the European Union:
Re-examination procedure on Zeftera concluded
The Committee confirmed its previous negative opinion and adopted a final negative opinion, recommending that Zeftera (ceftobiprole medocaril), from Janssen-Cilag International NV, should not be granted a marketing authorisation. Zeftera is an antibiotic, intended for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.
Arbitration procedures concluded
The Committee completed arbitration procedures initiated because of disagreement among EU Member States regarding the authorisation of Fortipan Combi D and Norsed Combi D (risedronate sodium, calcium carbonate and colecalciferol) and associated names, from Warner Chilcott UK Ltd and Sanofi-Aventis S.p.A. These medicines are indicated for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. The procedures were initiated because of concerns regarding the efficacy of these medicines, in particular regarding claims of improved benefit of the combination pack as compared with the individual active substances and improved compliance compared with the standard treatment. The Committee concluded that the combination pack will simplify the correct dosage regimen and did not consider the demonstration of improved compliance to be an absolute requirement for the approval of these combination products. Therefore, the Committee concluded that the benefit-risk profile of these medicines was positive and recommended that marketing authorisations should be granted.
The Committee completed an arbitration procedure initiated because of disagreement among EU Member States regarding the extension of the therapeutic indications for Genotropin (somatropin) and associated names, from Pfizer ApS. These medicines are indicated for treatment of children with growth disturbances and adults with growth hormone deficiency. This procedure was initiated because of concerns regarding the efficacy of these medicines in children with severe forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) requiring long-term glucocorticoid treatment. The Committee concluded that the benefit-risk profile of these medicines was negative in children with JIA requiring long term glucocorticoid treatment and recommended that the therapeutic indications should not be extended.
Harmonisation referral on candesartan & hydrochlorothiazide concluded
The Committee recommended harmonisation of the prescribing information for Atacand Plus (candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide) and associated names, from AstraZeneca group of companies. The review was initiated because of differences in the summaries of product characteristics, labelling and package leaflets in the countries where the products are marketed. These medicines are authorised to treat essential hypertension in patients whose blood pressure is not optimally controlled with candesartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy.
Review of benefits and risks for Invirase started
The Committee started a review of the benefits and risks of Invirase (saquinavir), in view of the results of a study conducted by the marketing authorisation holder, Roche Registration Ltd, investigating the proarrhythmic effect of ritonavir-boosted saquinavir in healthy volunteers. The study showed that Invirase had a marked effect on QT interval prolongation and PR prolongation. These findings have been included in the product information of Invirase and the use of Invirase has been contra-indicated in patients at high risk of arrhythmia and in patients using other medicines that may cause QT or PR prolongation. Warnings over its use in patients at moderate risk of arrhythmia, together with recommendations for ECG monitoring, have also been included in the product information. The review of the medicine's benefits and risks has been initiated to discuss any additional measures necessary to ensure the safe and effective use of Invirase and to determine how to balance the risks and benefits of the medicine. Ritonavir-boosted Invirase is indicated as combination treatment of HIV-infected adult patients.
Review of angiotensin II receptor inhibitors started
The Committee has begun looking at the possible risk of cancer in patients taking angiotensin II receptor inhibitors. This follows the publication of a meta-analysis reviewing nine randomised controlled trials involving almost 95,000 patients, which suggests that these medicines may be linked with a modestly increased risk of new diagnoses of cancer when compared with placebo or other heart medicines.
The CHMP will review the meta-analysis thoroughly, together with any other available non-clinical and clinical data (including data from clinical trials and epidemiological studies) on angiotensin II receptor inhibitors, to clarify whether there is an increased risk of cancer in patients taking these medicines. The Committee will also issue an opinion on whether a future change to the product information or risk-management plans for these medicines might be necessary.
Notes